Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hao Lee
Тема Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table?
Дата
Msg-id CAGoxFiFaNgR8_km2ae52sevZbx0xck6G6wpeZFXwmADG5eZ4ow@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table?  (digoal@126.com)
Список pgsql-bugs
In bool\blinsert.c, the function "blbuildempty" the if test failed. And, in
catlog\index.c line 2037, after creating the index file, then to build
empty index file. but we got the "one" block number of the relation, that
lead the if test failed.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:54 PM, <digoal@126.com> wrote:

> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference:      14158
> Logged by:          Zhou Digoal
> Email address:      digoal@126.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.6beta1
> Operating system:   CentOS 6.x x64
> Description:
>
> master=# create extension bloom;
> CREATE EXTENSION                          ^
> master=# create unlogged table tbl12(id int);
> CREATE TABLE
>
> master=# \set VERBOSITY verbose
> master=# create index idx1 on tbl12 using bloom (id);
> ERROR:  XX000: index "idx1" already contains data
> LOCATION:  blbuildempty, blinsert.c:164
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
>

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: digoal@126.com
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock