Re: One process per session lack of sharing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: One process per session lack of sharing
Дата
Msg-id CAGBW59cdfocRGYTTzri7mOKKORqhFku16RSGsBjt6sXYp575=A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: One process per session lack of sharing  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:


Lots more could be shared, too. Cached plans, for example.

But the fact that PostgreSQL has transactional DDL complicates things like
a shared plan cache and shared PL/pgSQL execution trees. Those things are
much easier in a trivial database implementation, where an ALTER TABLE is
just trampling over a running transaction.


Regards, Jan

--
Jan Wieck
Senior Postgres Architect

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: rethinking dense_alloc (HashJoin) as a memory context
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: One process per session lack of sharing