On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 4/11/18 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
>
>> Well, toward the end of the cycle, when the list of closed items is
>> quite long, then it does become a bit of a burden to carefully cut and
>> paste the item in the little browser window without making hash of the
>> wiki page.
>
>> It's not a very large deal, but I doubt the result is very useful. The
>> current "resolved before 11beta1" section is pretty much useless.
>
> Hm. There's definitely an argument to be made that it's not worth
> tracking resolved items till after beta1. Once betas exist, the list
> becomes useful to beta testers who may not be tracking events as closely
> as hackers do.
>
+1
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company