<div dir="ltr">Sorry for the trouble. Thanks Robert for fixing it.<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div
class="gmail_quote">OnWed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Robert Haas <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com"target="_blank">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquote
class="gmail_quote"style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:10
PM,Tom Lane <<a href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>> wrote:<br /> > Robert Haas <<a
href="mailto:rhaas@postgresql.org">rhaas@postgresql.org</a>>writes:<br /> >> postgres_fdw: Push down joins to
remoteservers.<br /> ><br /> > The buildfarm is not very impressed with this patch.<br /><br /> Well, I guess
that'swhy we have regression tests. It looks like that<br /> test case introduces a dependency on particular CTID
valuesthat<br /> wasn't there before. That doesn't seem like a very good idea; I'll<br /> remove that test.<br /><span
class="HOEnZb"><fontcolor="#888888"><br /> --<br /> Robert Haas<br /> EnterpriseDB: <a
href="http://www.enterprisedb.com"rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br /> The Enterprise
PostgreSQLCompany<br /><br /><br /> --<br /> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (<a
href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br/> To make changes to your
subscription:<br/><a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers</a><br/></font></span></blockquote></div><br /><br
clear="all"/><br />-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Best Wishes,<br />Ashutosh Bapat<br
/>EnterpriseDBCorporation<br />The Postgres Database Company<br /></div></div></div>