Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRDm9nhZCf16XDer-eeciqy0wipR0Y4+ZdwGMAWuv-k6ag@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Список pgsql-hackers


2018-03-07 14:10 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:


2018-03-07 13:58 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:47:25PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Do you mean that a shared dictionary should be reloaded if its .affix
> > and .dict files was changed? IMHO we can store last modification
> > timestamp of them in a preprocessed file, and then we can rebuild the
> > dictionary if files was changed.
> >
>
> No, it is not necessary - just there should be commands (functions)  for
> preload dictiory and unload dictionary.

Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll
implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time
too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional
commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll
made dictionaries maintenance harder.

Postgres hasn't any subsystem based on modification time, so introduction this sensitivity, I don't see, practical.

Usually the shared dictionaries are used for complex language based fulltext. The frequence of updates of these dictionaries is less than updates PostgreSQL. The czech dictionary is same 10 years.

Regards

Pavel
 

Regards

Pavel

 

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Следующее
От: Prabhat Sahu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)