Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2018-03-07 14:10 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
> > 2018-03-07 13:58 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>:
> >> Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll
> >> implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time
> >> too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional
> >> commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll
> >> made dictionaries maintenance harder.
> >>
> >
> > Postgres hasn't any subsystem based on modification time, so introduction
> > this sensitivity, I don't see, practical.
> >
> 
> Usually the shared dictionaries are used for complex language based
> fulltext. The frequence of updates of these dictionaries is less than
> updates PostgreSQL. The czech dictionary is same 10 years.

Agree. In this case auto reloading isn't important feature here.

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company