[HACKERS] proposal: schema variables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRDY+m9OOxfO10R7J0PAkCCauM-TweaTrdsrsLGMb1VbEQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Gilles Darold <gilles.darold@dalibo.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@adjust.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Pavel Golub <pavel@microolap.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi,

I propose a  new database object - a variable. The variable is persistent object, that holds unshared session based not transactional in memory value of any type. Like variables in any other languages. The persistence is required for possibility to do static checks, but can be limited to session - the variables can be temporal.

My proposal is related to session variables from Sybase, MSSQL or MySQL (based on prefix usage @ or @@), or package variables from Oracle (access is controlled by scope), or schema variables from DB2. Any design is coming from different sources, traditions and has some advantages or disadvantages. The base of my proposal is usage schema variables as session variables for stored procedures. It should to help to people who try to port complex projects to PostgreSQL from other databases.

The Sybase  (T-SQL) design is good for interactive work, but it is weak for usage in stored procedures - the static check is not possible. Is not possible to set some access rights on variables.

The ADA design (used on Oracle) based on scope is great, but our environment is not nested. And we should to support other PL than PLpgSQL more strongly.

There is not too much other possibilities - the variable that should be accessed from different PL, different procedures (in time) should to live somewhere over PL, and there is the schema only.

The variable can be created by CREATE statement:

CREATE VARIABLE public.myvar AS integer;
CREATE VARIABLE myschema.myvar AS mytype;

CREATE [TEMP] VARIABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] name AS type
  [ DEFAULT expression ] [[NOT] NULL]
  [ ON TRANSACTION END { RESET | DROP } ]
  [ { VOLATILE | STABLE } ];

It is dropped by command DROP VARIABLE  [ IF EXISTS] varname.

The access rights is controlled by usual access rights - by commands GRANT/REVOKE. The possible rights are: READ, WRITE

The variables can be modified by SQL command SET (this is taken from standard, and it natural)

SET varname = expression;

Unfortunately we use the SET command for different purpose. But I am thinking so we can solve it with few tricks. The first is moving our GUC to pg_catalog schema. We can control the strictness of SET command. In one variant, we can detect custom GUC and allow it, in another we can disallow a custom GUC and allow only schema variables. A new command LET can be alternative.

The variables should be used in queries implicitly (without JOIN)

SELECT varname;

The SEARCH_PATH is used, when varname is located. The variables can be used everywhere where query parameters are allowed.

I hope so this proposal is good enough and simple.

Comments, notes?

regards

Pavel


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions