Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRCv8sfkud=--eRTakwBJGpEkK8ebMxj40ugCyk8Z6H=2Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi

2016-09-28 18:57 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2016-09-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> I propose to push my current patch (ie, move PL function
>> source code to \df+ footers), and we can use it in HEAD for awhile
>> and see what we think.  We can alway improve or revert it later.

> I had some objection to format of source code - it should be full source
> code, not just header and body.

That would be redundant with stuff that's in the main part of the \df
display.  I really don't need to see the argument types twice, for instance.

I am sorry, I disagree. Proposed form is hard readable. Is not possible to simply copy/paste.

I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.

Regards

Pavel
 

                        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: should xlog_outdesc modify its argument?
Следующее
От: Christoph Berg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers