čt 18. 4. 2019 v 18:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> napsal:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 06:06:40PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > čt 18. 4. 2019 v 17:58 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> napsal: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > čt 18. 4. 2019 v 15:51 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> > napsal: > > In testing pspg, it seems to work fine with tabular and \ > x-non-tabular > > data. Are you asking for a pager option that is only used for non-\x > > display? What do people want the non-pspg pager to do? > > > > My idea is following - pseudocode > > > > else /* for \h xxx */ > > Well, normal output and \x looks fine in pspg, and \h doesn't use the > pager unless it is more than one screen. If I do '\h *' it uses pspg, > but now often do people do that? Most \h display doesn't use a pager, > so I don't see the point. > > > It depends on terminal size. On my terminal pager is mostly every time. \? is > same. > > pspg can works like classic pager, but it is not optimized for this purpose.
Uh, the odd thing is that \? and sometimes \h are the only case I can see where using the classic page has much value. Are there more cases? If not, I don't see the value in having a separate configuration variable for this.
I don't know any about other cases. Other results in psql has tabular format.