Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-tK2H4mWDFiMxxAk65N2uXnwJHcsveqfNCyk=wh97aw5w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Andres Freund
<spandir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andres@anarazel.de" target="_blank">andres@anarazel.de</a>></span> wrote:<br
/><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Soundslike a ppc vs. x86 issue. The regression was on the former,
right?</blockquote></div><br/></div><div class="gmail_extra">Well, Regression what I reported last two time, out of
thatone was on X86 and other was on PPC.<br /><br /><br />Copied from older Threads<br
/>--------------------------------------<br/>On PPC<br /><span class="im">>> > > > >> ./pgbench
 -j$-c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres<br />>> > > > >><br />>> > > > >>
Client   Base    Patch<br />>> > > > >> 1    17169    16454<br />>> > > > >>
8   108547    105559<br />>> > > > >> 32    241619    262818<br />>> > > > >>
64   206868    233606<br />>> > > > >> 128    137084    217013</span><br /><br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra">OnX86<br /><span><span class="im">>> > > > >></span>Shared Buffer= 8GB<br
/></span><span><spanclass="im">>> > > > >></span>Scale Factor=300</span><span class="im"><br /><br
/><span></span></span><spanclass="im"><span><span class="im">>> > > > >></span>./pgbench  -j$ -c$
-T300-M prepared -S postgres</span><br /></span><span class="im">>> > > > >></span>client        
base       patch<br /><span class="im">>> > > > >></span>1               7057         5230<br
/><spanclass="im">>> > > > >></span>2             10043         9573<br /><span
class="im">>>> > > >></span>4             20140        18188<br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra"><br/><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">And this latest result (no regression) is on X86 but on
mylocal machine.<br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">I did not exactly saw what this new version of patch is
doingdifferent, so I will test this version in other machines also and see the results. <br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra"><brclear="all" /><br />-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><span
style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px">Regards,</span><brstyle="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px" /><span
style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px">DilipKumar</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px" /><span
style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px">EnterpriseDB: </span><ahref="http://www.enterprisedb.com/"
style="color:rgb(17,85,204);font-size:12.8px"target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br
/></div></div></div></div>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc