Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-sQ6h+VB_dKAqREdzCcW8YU2+5rzn8cgLQQw9WXOu4CPw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 8:14 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > LOG:  level: 1; AV worker: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 7928 free (0 chunks); 264 used
>
> Good catch. I've seen the use of "AV" in some of the mem context
> names, why that? Let's be specific and say "Autovacuum". Attached
> patch does that. Please review it.

+1, the error message and other improvements look good.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Следующее
От: Amul Sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: inefficient loop in StandbyReleaseLockList()