<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Michael Paquier <<a
href="mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com">michael.paquier@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br />><br />> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014
at7:43 AM, Vik Fearing <<a href="mailto:vik.fearing@dalibo.com">vik.fearing@dalibo.com</a>> wrote:<br /> >
>On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:<br />> >> On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:<br
/>>>>> Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for<br />> >>> Committer:
16,Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4.<br /> > >>> Total: 114.<br />> >>><br
/>>>>> We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would<br />> >>> be
similarto the previous few commit fests. So decent job so far.<br /> > >> So, other than Hstore2/JSONB and
LogicalChangesets, what are the<br />> >> big/difficult patches left?<br />> ><br />> > For me,
I'dreally like to see the reduced locks on ALTER TABLE.<br /> > The patch by Peter to improve test coverage for
clientprograms. This<br />> is helpful for QE/QA teams evaluating Postgres, and it could be<br />> extended for
otherthings like replication test suite as well as far<br /> > as I understood.<br />> <br /><br />+1<br /><br
/>--<br/>Fabrízio de Royes Mello<br />Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL<br />>> Timbira: <a
href="http://www.timbira.com.br">http://www.timbira.com.br</a><br/>>> Blog sobre TI: <a
href="http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com">http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com</a><br/> >> Perfil Linkedin: <a
href="http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello">http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello</a><br/>>> Twitter: <a
href="http://twitter.com/fabriziomello">http://twitter.com/fabriziomello</a></div></div>