Re: [HACKERS] search path security issue?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Тема Re: [HACKERS] search path security issue?
Дата
Msg-id CAFcNs+r9VXLj8DU6Ssu31Nob_OKsS2RBbCbTYovqfYp73TkxRg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] search path security issue?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/06/2017 12:52 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > It would be a nice feature to have in general, like a "basic guc
> > permissions" thing. At least allowing a superuser to prevent exactly
> > this. You could argue the same thing for example for memory parameters
> > and such. We have no permissions at all when it comes to userset gucs
> > today -- and of course, if something should be added about this, it
> > should be done in a way that works for all the userset variables, not
> > just search_path.
>
> +1
>
> I have wished for exactly that more than once before.
>

+1

I have a multi-user and schema database with some user restrictions because it's a shared environment (i.e: statement_timeout, lock_timeout). But some "smart" users change to the GUC default and sometimes we suffer with it. Would be nice to have some kind of guc permissions.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] heap/SLRU verification, relfrozenxid cut-off, and freeze-the-dead bug(Was: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool))
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple