On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziomello@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> I think it's really too late for this for 9.4. At this point it's
> >> less than 48 hours until beta1 wraps, and we do not have the bandwidth
> >> to do anything but worry about stabilizing the features we've already
> >> got.
>
> > But it's a very small change with many benefits, and Michael acted very
> > proactive to make this happens.
>
> [ shrug... ] "proactive" would have been doing this a month ago.
> If we're going to ship a release, we have to stop taking new features
> at some point, and we are really past that point for 9.4.
>
> And, to be blunt, this is not important enough to hold up the release
> for, nor to take any stability risks for. It should go into the next
> commitfest cycle where it can get a non-rushed review.
>
I agree with you that is too late to add *new features*.
But I agree with Andres when he said this is a regression introcuced in the pg_lsn patch.
So we'll release a version that break a simple query like that: