On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 4:28 AM tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/24/21 10:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Here's v9, fixing the issue reported by Fujii Masao.
>
> Please refer this scenario where publication on v14RC1 and subscription
> on HEAD (w/patch)
>
> --create a subscription with parameter two_phase=1 on HEAD
>
> postgres=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION r1015 CONNECTION 'dbname=postgres
> host=localhost port=5454' PUBLICATION p WITH (two_phase=1);
> NOTICE: created replication slot "r1015" on publisher
> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
> postgres=#
>
> --check on 14RC1
>
> postgres=# select two_phase from pg_replication_slots where
> slot_name='r105';
> two_phase
> -----------
> f
> (1 row)
>
> so are we silently ignoring this parameter as it is not supported on
> v14RC/HEAD ? and if yes then why not we just throw an message like
> ERROR: unrecognized subscription parameter: "two_phase"
>
> --
There is usually a time lag between a subscription created with two_phase on and
the slot on the publisher enabling two_phase. It only happens after a
tablesync is completed and
the apply worker is restarted. There are logs which indicate that this
has happened. If you could share the
logs (on publisher and subscriber) when this happens, I could have a look.
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia