Re: How to store "blobs" efficiently for small and large sizes, with random access

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 5:30 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> That's exactly what I was trying to say.
> If there's no compression, we don't read prior chunks.

Great to read that. I'll probably try to benchmark w/ and w/o
compression eventually.
Need to deal with other issues first, will take a while to report back on this.

> This can be seen in detoast_attr_slice()

Thank you for the pointer. I'll be sure to have a look at that code.
And thanks again for chiming in, with very useful info Alvaro.