Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAFBsxsGJXHezeP-zSh0ifvpN_Gj9umcMjFjchhX5v4NC3BakUg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Overall, radix tree implementations have good numbers. Once we got an
> agreement on moving in this direction, I'll start a new thread for
> that and move the implementation further; there are many things to do
> and discuss: deletion, API design, SIMD support, more tests etc.

+1

(FWIW, I think the current thread is still fine.)

-- 
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash index build performance tweak from sorting
Следующее
От: Mahendra Singh Thalor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Collecting statistics about contents of JSONB columns