Re: Query runs on 9.2, but not on 9.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vasilis Ventirozos
Тема Re: Query runs on 9.2, but not on 9.4
Дата
Msg-id CAF8jcqrC4yRakxN_QJWivJ_R1ThPt80je1HjHOtjVh1+CJ9gkQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Query runs on 9.2, but not on 9.4  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
Hey John,
this happens because pg_relation_size(c.oid) returns 0 for one or more rows, try :

SELECT
c.relname,pg_size_pretty(count(*) * 8192) as buffered,round(100.0 * count(*) / (SELECT setting FROM pg_settings WHERE name='shared_buffers')::integer,1) AS buffers_percent,
round(100.0 * count(*) * 8192 / pg_relation_size(c.oid),1) AS percent_of_relation
FROM pg_class c
INNER JOIN pg_buffercache b
ON b.relfilenode = c.relfilenode
INNER JOIN pg_database d
ON (b.reldatabase = d.oid AND d.datname = current_database())
where pg_relation_size(c.oid) >0
GROUP BY c.oid,c.relname
ORDER BY 3 DESC
LIMIT 25;
i'll also put this on my forum, thanks for reading btw :)

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:56 PM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

I've got a query I use to show the amount of shared buffers in use that is giving me some issues. It uses the pg_buffercache extension. The query is:

SELECT
c.relname,
pg_size_pretty(count(*) * 8192) as buffered,
round(100.0 * count(*) /
(SELECT setting FROM pg_settings
WHERE name='shared_buffers')::integer,1)
AS buffers_percent,
round(100.0 * count(*) * 8192 /
pg_relation_size(c.oid),1)
AS percent_of_relation
FROM pg_class c
INNER JOIN pg_buffercache b
ON b.relfilenode = c.relfilenode
INNER JOIN pg_database d
ON (b.reldatabase = d.oid AND d.datname = current_database())
GROUP BY c.oid,c.relname
ORDER BY 3 DESC
LIMIT 25;

On a 9.2 system, it runs fine and produces a list of the top 25 tables using the shared buffer, but on 9.3 and above, it throw a "division by zero" error. I've run explain for the query on both the 9.2 and the 9.4 server, and the only difference I can see is the 9.4 server shows an additional index scan that the 9.2 server does not. Here's the explain from the 9.4 server:

QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Limit  (cost=59.73..59.74 rows=5 width=68)
   InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
     ->  Function Scan on pg_show_all_settings a  (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=5 width=32)
           Filter: (name = 'shared_buffers'::text)
   ->  Sort  (cost=47.22..47.24 rows=5 width=68)
         Sort Key: (round(((100.0 * (count(*))::numeric) / (($0)::integer)::numeric), 1))
         ->  HashAggregate  (cost=46.91..47.16 rows=5 width=68)
               Group Key: c.oid, c.relname
               ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.30..46.85 rows=5 width=68)
                     ->  Hash Join  (cost=1.03..14.83 rows=5 width=4)
                           Hash Cond: (p.reldatabase = d.oid)
                           ->  Function Scan on pg_buffercache_pages p  (cost=0.00..10.00 rows=1000 width=8)
                           ->  Hash  (cost=1.01..1.01 rows=1 width=4)
                                 ->  Seq Scan on pg_database d  (cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=4)
                                       Filter: (datname = current_database())
                     ->  Index Scan using pg_class_tblspc_relfilenode_index on pg_class c  (cost=0.28..6.39 rows=1 width=72)
                           Index Cond: (relfilenode = p.relfilenode)
(17 rows)

The explain for the 9.2 server is the same, except as noted, the 9.4 has that additional Index Scan at the very end. I've tried contacting the original author on evol-monkey.blogspot.com, but the authentication there is broken, and won't let me comment on his page.

Anybody have any ideas for why this breaks and what I can do to fix it? I've been looking at for a day or so with no success.
--
Jay

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Ribe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query runs on 9.2, but not on 9.4
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query runs on 9.2, but not on 9.4