On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> Arguments pro and contra diagrams are not the central focus of SGML to
>> XML conversion, nevertheless: "Diagrams" didn't mean any binary format
>> - only SVN or any other text-format is acceptable. And: if the SVN
>> source is generated by any program like Inkscape it tends to get
>> unreadable. But if we develop a SVN-library with our own predefined
>> graphical elements, the SVN source gets very clear. The discussion of
>> 2011 mentioned below was continued in 2016:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5690218B.9060103%40purtz.de.
>
> Oh I didn't know that. Thank you for pointing it out. I hope this work
> will be included in 10.0.
We discussed diagrams in docs at PGCon-2016. Heikki's attempt is here
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Figures_%26_Pics_in_Docs and Emre
made even better using markdeep https://casual-effects.com/markdeep/
I attached his version and it looks very interesting (open it in firefox).
Diagrams made in this way don't need any new tools to learn.
Oleg
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs