Re: Server crash on RHEL 9/s390x platform against PG16
От | Suraj Kharage |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server crash on RHEL 9/s390x platform against PG16 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAF1DzPU_QUXO4S_jAcRJs+1O1GzNVKDe6KWHiv2Bz7HSHiz-vA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Server crash on RHEL 9/s390x platform against PG16 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-09-12 15:27:21 +0530, Suraj Kharage wrote:
> *[edb@9428da9d2137 postgres]$ cat /etc/redhat-release AlmaLinux release 9.2
> (Turquoise Kodkod)[edb@9428da9d2137 postgres]$ lscpuArchitecture:
> s390x CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 39 bits
Can you provide the rest of the lscpu output? There have been issues with Z14
vs Z15:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53009
You're apparently not hitting that, but given that fact, you either are on a
slightly older CPU, or you have applied a patch to work around it. Because
otherwise your uild instructions below would hit that problem, I think.
> physical, 48 bits virtual Byte Order: Big Endian*
> *Configure command:*
> ./configure --prefix=/home/edb/postgres/ --with-lz4 --with-zstd --with-llvm
> --with-perl --with-python --with-tcl --with-openssl --enable-nls
> --with-libxml --with-libxslt --with-systemd --with-libcurl --without-icu
> --enable-debug --enable-cassert --with-pgport=5414
Hm, based on "--with-libcurl" this isn't upstream postgres, correct? Have you
verified the issue reproduces on upstream postgres?
Here are details:
./configure --prefix=/home/edb/postgres/ --with-zstd --with-llvm --with-perl --with-python --with-tcl --with-openssl --enable-nls --with-libxml --with-libxslt --with-systemd --without-icu --enable-debug --enable-cassert --with-pgport=5414 CFLAGS="-g -O0"
[edb@9428da9d2137 postgres]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
AlmaLinux release 9.2 (Turquoise Kodkod)
[edb@9428da9d2137 edbas]$ lscpu
Architecture: s390x
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Byte Order: Big Endian
CPU(s): 9
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-8
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz
CPU family: 6
Model: 158
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 1
Socket(s): 9
Stepping: 10
BogoMIPS: 5200.00
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid pni pclmulqdq dtes64 ds_cpl ssse3 sdbg fma cx
16 xtpr pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 bmi2 erms xsaveopt arat
Caches (sum of all):
L1d: 288 KiB (9 instances)
L1i: 288 KiB (9 instances)
L2: 2.3 MiB (9 instances)
L3: 108 MiB (9 instances)
Vulnerabilities:
Itlb multihit: KVM: Mitigation: VMX unsupported
L1tf: Mitigation; PTE Inversion
Mds: Vulnerable; SMT Host state unknown
Meltdown: Vulnerable
Mmio stale data: Vulnerable
Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Spectre v1: Vulnerable: __user pointer sanitization and usercopy barriers only; no swapgs barriers
Spectre v2: Vulnerable, STIBP: disabled
Srbds: Unknown: Dependent on hypervisor status
Tsx async abort: Not affected
[edb@9428da9d2137 postgres]$ clang --version
clang version 15.0.7 (Red Hat 15.0.7-2.el9)
Target: s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
[edb@9428da9d2137 postgres]$ rpm -qa | grep llvm
llvm-libs-15.0.7-1.el9.s390x
llvm-15.0.7-1.el9.s390x
llvm-test-15.0.7-1.el9.s390x
llvm-static-15.0.7-1.el9.s390x
llvm-devel-15.0.7-1.el9.s390x
>
> *Test case:*
> CREATE TABLE rm32044_t1
> (
> pkey integer,
> val text
> );
> CREATE TABLE rm32044_t2
> (
> pkey integer,
> label text,
> hidden boolean
> );
> CREATE TABLE rm32044_t3
> (
> pkey integer,
> val integer
> );
> CREATE TABLE rm32044_t4
> (
> pkey integer
> );
> insert into rm32044_t1 values ( 1 , 'row1');
> insert into rm32044_t1 values ( 2 , 'row2');
> insert into rm32044_t2 values ( 1 , 'hidden', true);
> insert into rm32044_t2 values ( 2 , 'visible', false);
> insert into rm32044_t3 values (1 , 1);
> insert into rm32044_t3 values (2 , 1);
>
> postgres=# SELECT * FROM rm32044_t1 LEFT JOIN rm32044_t2 ON rm32044_t1.pkey
> = rm32044_t2.pkey, rm32044_t3 LEFT JOIN rm32044_t4 ON rm32044_t3.pkey =
> rm32044_t4.pkey order by rm32044_t1.pkey,label,hidden;
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
> This probably means the server terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.
> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
I tried this on both master and 16, without hitting this issue.
If you can reproduce the issue on upstream postgres, can you share more about
your configuration?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
Следующее
От: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"Дата:
Сообщение: RE: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing