Re: Why we lost Uber as a user

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Geoff Winkless
Тема Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Дата
Msg-id CAEzk6fenkdBOLnc4rZPo+Q2sgcRWDEo08qKdBvc-V8Rvw9fnEA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly.burovoy@gmail.com>)
Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (pgwhatever <michael@sqlexec.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 27 July 2016 at 17:04, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Well, their big complaint about binary replication is that a bug can
spread from a master to all slaves, which doesn't happen with statement
level replication.  

​I'm not sure that that makes sense to me. If there's a database bug that occurs when you run a statement on the master, it seems there's a decent chance that that same bug is going to occur when you run the same statement on the slave.

Obviously it depends on the type of bug and how identical the slave is, but statement-level replication certainly doesn't preclude such a bug from propagating.​
 

​Geoff​

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade: exit_hook_registered variable
Следующее
От: Vitaly Burovoy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why we lost Uber as a user