Re: [HACKERS] jsonb problematic operators

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Geoff Winkless
Тема Re: [HACKERS] jsonb problematic operators
Дата
Msg-id CAEzk6fe0=xu+kh0j8uMJ-NwUd=+952tLe-HvCPHCsJsMGnLa+Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] jsonb problematic operators  (Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] jsonb problematic operators  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 9 Dec 2016 17:54, "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2016-12-09 12:17:32 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> As Geoff says, you don't have to use the operators; you could use the
> equivalent functions instead.  Every operator just gets turned into a
> function call internally, so this is always possible.

Well, except that only operators support indexing :(

Really? Seems like an odd design decision.

The only other simple suggestion then would be to use PDO named parameters instead of positional ones. Much nicer syntax anyway, IMO.

Geoff


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Borodin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] background sessions
Следующее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes