<div dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">Le 23 juil. 2015 19:27, "Alvaro Herrera" <<a href="mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com"
target="_blank">alvherre@2ndquadrant.com</a>>a écrit :<br /> ><br /> > Laurent Laborde wrote:<br /> ><br />
>> Friendly greetings !<br /> > ><br /> > > What's the status of parallel clusterdb please ?<br />
>> I'm having fun (and troubles) applying the vacuumdb patch to clusterdb.<br /> > ><br /> > > This
threadalso talk about unifying code for parallelizing clusterdb and<br /> > > reindex.<br /> > > Was
anythingdone about it ? Because i can't see it and my work currently<br /> > > involve a lot of copy/pasting from
vacuumdbto clusterdb :)<br /> ><br /> > Honestly, I have to wonder whether there are really valid use cases
for<br/> > clusterdb. Are you actually using it and want to see it improved, or is<br /> > this just an
academicalexercise?<p dir="ltr">Purely academical. I don't use it.<br /><p dir="ltr">> > And no, (i'm pretty
sure)i don't have the required postgresql knowledge to<br /> > > do this unification if it isn't done already.<br
/>><br /> > You may or may not lack it *now*, but that doesn't mean you will<br /> > continue to lack it
forever.<pdir="ltr">That's why i'm working on it :)<br /><br />--<br />Laurent "ker2x" Laborde<br />DBA \o/ <a
href="http://gandi.net">gandi.net</a></div>