On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:49 PM David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, December 10, 2020, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 9:10 PM David G. Johnston
>> <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > Would it be accurate to add the following sentence to the INSERT documentation under "Outputs"?
>> >
>> > "...inserted or updated by the command." For a multiple-values insertion, the order of output rows will match the
orderthat rows are presented in the values or query clause.
>>
>> Postgres's current implementation may be doing so, but I don't think
>> that can be guaranteed in possible implementations. I don't think
>> restricting choice of implementation to guarantee that is a good idea
>> either.
>>
>
> Yeah, the ongoing work on parallel inserts would seem to be an issue. We should probably document that though. And
maybeas part of parallel inserts patch provide a user-specifiable way to ask for such a guarantee if needed. ‘Insert
returningordered”
I am curious about the usecase which needs that guarantee? Don't you
have a column on which you can ORDER BY so that it returns the same
order as INSERT?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat