Yes, but the comment it does not clarify that the return of the variable "const_one" is intentional, instead of "const_zero".
Anybody with reads the source, can think which is a copy and paste mistake.
regards
Ranier Vilela
Em dom., 19 de jan. de 2020 às 21:22, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> writes: > Possible copy and past error, found in numeric.c. > I believe I believe that the author's intention was to return const_zero.