Re: Standardize type of variable when extending Buffers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ranier Vilela
Тема Re: Standardize type of variable when extending Buffers
Дата
Msg-id CAEudQAqJMrnmGPMsBVnLkKOJHPuv7JXB5t4xjQXb8WmjZjeSFw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Standardize type of variable when extending Buffers  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Standardize type of variable when extending Buffers
Список pgsql-hackers

Em seg., 10 de jul. de 2023 às 03:27, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> escreveu:
At Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:29:16 -0700, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> wrote in
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:12 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This has already been discussed in [1].
> > But I thought it best to start a new thread.
> >
> > The commit 31966b1 introduced the infrastructure to extend
> > buffers.
> > But the patch mixed types with int and uint32.
> > The correct type of the variable counter is uint32.
> >
> > Fix by standardizing the int type to uint32.
> >
> > patch attached.
>
> LGTM.

LGTM, too.
Thanks Gurjeet and Kyotaro, for taking a look.


I don't think it will actually come to play, since I believe we won't
be expanding a relation by 16TB all at once. Nevertheless, I believe
keeping things tidy is a good habit to stick to.
Yeah, mainly because of copy-and-paste.
Also, compiler has to promote int to uint32, anyway.

regards,
Ranier Vilela

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kumar, Sachin"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: Using BRIN indexes for sorted output