Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Дата
Msg-id CAEepm=3WQYdz4YUhiKk4Oq-FxUw-1oBf+c_3-Rx4ygC0K9ZEPg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for explaining the problem in generating an isolation test to
>> test the serialize parallel query.
>>
>> Committer can decide whether existing test is fine to part of the test suite
>> or remove it, other than that everything is fine. so I am moving the patch
>> into "ready for committer" state.
>
> Thank you!  I will try to find a good benchmark that will really
> exercise parallel query + SSI.

This started crashing some time yesterday with an assertion failure in
the isolation tests after commit 2badb5af landed.  Reordering of code
in parallel.c confused patch's fuzz heuristics leading
SetSerializableXact() to be called too soon.  Here's a fix for that.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: copy.c allocation constant