On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Actually, that didn't take too long.
>
> No testing yet, but this runs a build successfully:
> <https://gist.github.com/adunstan/7f18e5db33bb2d73f69ff8c9337a4e6c>
>
> See results at <https://ci.appveyor.com/project/AndrewDunstan/pgdevel>
Excellent! Thanks for looking at this, Andrew. It's going to be
really useful for removing surprises.
It would be nice to finish up with a little library of control files
like this for different CI vendors, possibly with some different
options (different compilers, different word size, add valgrind, ...).
I don't know if it would ever make sense to have standardised CI
control files in the tree -- many projects do -- but it's very easy to
carry a commit that adds them in development branches but drop it as
part of the format-patch-and-post process.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers