Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Sharma
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Дата
Msg-id CAE9k0PkpOJkPXWrv_dqu_fhjw4+XW=weN_6kyUZXXZw0rxGRdQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 04:41, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Okay. As suggested by Alexander, I have changed the order of reading and
>> doing initdb for each pgbench run. With these changes, I got following
>> results at 300 scale factor with 8GB of shared buffer.
>
>
> Would you be able to test my patch also please?
>

Sure, I can do that and share the results by early next week. Thanks.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Poor memory context performance in large hash joins
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)