Re: [HACKERS] Page Scan Mode in Hash Index

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Jesper Pedersen
 wrote:
> On 08/23/2017 07:38 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the new version.  I again looked at the patches and fixed
>> quite a few comments in the code and ReadMe.  You have forgotten to
>> update README for the changes in vacuum patch
>> (0003-Improve-locking-startegy-during-VACUUM-in-Hash-Index_v7).  I
>> don't have anything more to add.  If you are okay with changes, then
>> we can move it to Ready For Committer unless someone else has some
>> more comments.
>>
>
> Just some minor comments.

Thanks for the review.

>
> README:
> +       it's pin till the end of scan)
>
> its pin till the end of the scan)

Corrected.

>
> +To minimize lock/unlock traffic, hash index scan always searches entire
> hash
>
> To minimize lock/unlock traffic, hash index scan always searches the entire
> hash

Done.

>
> hashsearch.c:
>
> +static inline void _hash_saveitem(HashScanOpaque so, int itemIndex,
> +                          OffsetNumber offnum, IndexTuple itup);
>
> There are other instances of "inline" in the code base, so I guess that this
> is ok.
>
> +        * Advance to next tuple on current page; or if there's no more, try
> to
>
> Advance to the next tuple on the current page; or if done, try to
>

Done.

Attached are the patches with above changes.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma
EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers