2013/1/15 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>:
> Kohei KaiGai escribió:
>
>> The attached patch is a rebased version towards the latest master
>> branch, and fix up the issue around error messages on name conflicts.
>
> I assume the lock.c changes are just a bollixed merge, right?
>
Yes, I'll check it and rebase it.
> I am not sure about some of the changes in the regression test expected
> output; are we really okay with losing the "in schema foo" part in some
> of these cases?
>
The changes in the expected results in regression test originated from
elimination of getObjectDescription, but "in schema foo" should be kept.
It looks like an obvious my mistake. Sorry.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>