Re: [HACKERS] NoMovementScanDirection in heapgettup() and heapgettup_pagemode()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mithun Cy
Тема Re: [HACKERS] NoMovementScanDirection in heapgettup() and heapgettup_pagemode()
Дата
Msg-id CAD__OugcMktg-ePOpNnnSB3pqk3UAJoJHTANjt=5HpVyHmXOYQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] NoMovementScanDirection in heapgettup() and heapgettup_pagemode()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think that's probably dead code given that ExecutorRun short-circuits
> everything for NoMovementScanDirection.  There is some use of
> NoMovementScanDirection for indexscans, to denote an unordered index,
> but likely that could be got rid of too.  That would leave us with
> NoMovementScanDirection having no other use except as a do-nothing
> flag for ExecutorRun.
>
>                         regards, tom lane

Thanks, Tom, yes it seems to be a dead code.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] show "aggressive" or not in autovacuum logs
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands