Re: Named Prepared statement problems and possible solutions

On 6/8/23 09:53, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 6/8/23 09:21, Dave Cramer wrote:
> The server doesn't know about all the clients of the pooler, does it? It
> has no way of telling if/when a client disconnects from the pooler.

Another problem that complicates doing it in the server is that the
information require to (re-)prepare a statement in a backend that
currently doesn't have it needs to be kept in shared memory. This
includes the query string itself. Doing that without shared memory in a
pooler that is multi-threaded or based on async-IO is much simpler and
allows for easy ballooning.