On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:16 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:58:16 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote in
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:58 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Mmm. the patch changed that behavior. AllocateSnapshotBuilder always
> > > allocate the array with a fixed size. SnapBuildAddCommittedTxn still
> > > assumes builder->committed.xip is non-NULL. SnapBuildRestore *kept*
> > > ondisk.builder.commited.xip populated with a valid array pointer. But
> > > the patch allows committed.xip be NULL, thus in that case,
> > > SnapBuildAddCommitedTxn calls repalloc(NULL) which triggers assertion
> > > failure.
> >
> > IIUC the patch doesn't allow committed.xip to be NULL since we don't
> > overwrite it if builder->committed.xcnt is 0 (i.e.,
> > ondisk.builder.committed.xip is NULL):
>
> I meant that ondisk.builder.committed.xip can be NULL.. But looking
> again that cannot be. I don't understand what I was looking at at
> that time.
>
> So, sorry for the noise.
No problem. Thank you for your review and comments!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/