At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:58:16 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote in
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:58 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mmm. the patch changed that behavior. AllocateSnapshotBuilder always
> > allocate the array with a fixed size. SnapBuildAddCommittedTxn still
> > assumes builder->committed.xip is non-NULL. SnapBuildRestore *kept*
> > ondisk.builder.commited.xip populated with a valid array pointer. But
> > the patch allows committed.xip be NULL, thus in that case,
> > SnapBuildAddCommitedTxn calls repalloc(NULL) which triggers assertion
> > failure.
>
> IIUC the patch doesn't allow committed.xip to be NULL since we don't
> overwrite it if builder->committed.xcnt is 0 (i.e.,
> ondisk.builder.committed.xip is NULL):
I meant that ondisk.builder.committed.xip can be NULL.. But looking
again that cannot be. I don't understand what I was looking at at
that time.
So, sorry for the noise.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center