Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:30 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:42 PM John Naylor
> <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 1:51 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've attached the new version patches. I merged improvements and fixes
> > > I did in the v29 patch.
> >
> > I haven't yet had a chance to look at those closely, since I've had to devote time to other commitments. I remember
Iwasn't particularly impressed that v29-0008 mixed my requested name-casing changes with a bunch of other random
things.Separating those out would be an obvious way to make it easier for me to look at, whenever I can get back to
this.I need to look at the iteration changes as well, in addition to testing memory measurement (thanks for the new
results,they look encouraging). 
>
> Okay, I'll separate them again.

Attached new patch series. In addition to separate them again, I've
fixed a conflict with HEAD.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com