On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:15 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:01 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2019年4月8日(月) 14:22 Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> > >>
> > >> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com]
> > >> > "vacuum_truncate" gets my vote too.
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > > ISTM that we have small consensus to
> > > use "vacuum_truncate".
> >
> > I'm also fine with this name, and I also saw reports that this option
> > is already needed in some production workload, as Andres explained.
>
> OK, so I pushed the "vacuum_truncate" version of the patch.
Thank you!
"TRUNCATE" option for vacuum command should be added to the open items?
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center