On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/17 01:10, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> It's not critical but it could be problem. So I thought we should fix
>>> it before the PostgreSQL 10 release. If it's not appropriate as an
>>> open item I'll remove it.
>>
>> You wrote that you "sent" a patch, but I don't see a patch anywhere.
>>
>> I think a nonintrusive patch for this could be considered.
>
> Oops, I made a mistake. I'll send a patch tomorrow.
>
I've attached the patch. This patch introduces GUC parameter
table_sync_retry_interval which controls the interval of launching the
table sync worker process.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers