Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEy1r94m2_AaUrXZC87BTxtEQL_FsMQo=J4xpczbdrnKLQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:


On 04/07/2017 09:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems be the same as the 2nd error that was reported back in 2013:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ2%3DPVQcW8UGNnSy%3DOw%3DvUK2zpjowTkzUS1B864REa7LOT140Q%40mail.gmail.com.
> Well, if it's been broken since (at least) 2013, and we've had only one
> complaint, then I'd say there are too few potential users to justify
> the maintenance burden.
>
>


I agree.

Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak?

If so, count me in for the same :) Want me to do the honors, as it's my fault they're in there in the first place?

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Allowing extended stats on foreign and partitioned tables