Re: [HACKERS] GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions
Дата
Msg-id CACjxUsP0ObuZYq9NfJ6hLOnsHR-2+avcw63gBUoM0u3UeG3Ryw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions  ("Mengxing Liu" <liu-mx15@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> [two people interested in the same GSoC project]

It's an interesting problem to have.

If neither of you chooses to voluntarily back down, the obvious
resolution is for the mentors to vote on the better proposal.  If we
do that early enough during the student application period, there
might still be time for the person whose proposal wasn't chosen to
submit a proposal for an alternative project.  As I see it, that
means:
- I would tend to favor a proposal submitted on the first day  (beginning March 20 16:00 UTC), if only one is.
- I would push for very early voting by the PostgreSQL mentors.

--
Kevin Grittner



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors