Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> ... So I think the logging setup I had in
>> my patch is pretty much the only sane way to do it, and we just have
>> to decide whether it's worth exposing at default log level or not.

> I definitely think we should include it at the default log level.  We
> certainly wouldn't be the first daemon process to do so (bind9 comes to
> mind, but I notice ntpd, nrpe, and strongswan do also, and probably some
> others).

I'm leaning in that direction as well now.  I think we could address
Robert's concern about startup chattiness by downgrading the other
mentioned messages to DEBUG1.  I will check, but I'm pretty sure that
there is already adequate logging for subprocess startup failure ---
and if there is not, that would be a bug in itself.
        regards, tom lane