Re: JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sylvain Mougenot
Тема Re: JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?
Дата
Msg-id CACKdPFi5hoQsgVZim26R-DbnaXyXdiCbUnCof0iQxyLmh+8PgQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
Ответы Re: JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
Список pgsql-sql
Thank you Craig Ringer for the detailed list of post (I found some by myself).
Specially, I'm glad to see it is #1 "TODO" on the compliance matters.

As a reminder, I found post (on the net, not only on this forum) about this issue more than 3 years old!
And still : The driver doesn't implement it.

So, 
Does anyone know if there is a plan to implement this feature?

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> wrote:
On 14/12/2011 9:29 PM, Sylvain Mougenot wrote:
Even if the behaviour is not implemented, I guess it could be "mocked" if the call to Statement.setQueryTimeout(int seconds) generated the select statement "SELECT statement_timeout(SEC)".
I know this is not ideal but could solve the problem temporarily.
I could even be turned on by some driver settings.


(following up on last post): See in particular this thread:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2010-10/msg00071.php

with posts like:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2010-10/msg00131.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2010-10/msg00077.php


I'm a little concerned about the proposal to use a java.util.Timer, as IIRC there are issues with using a Timer in a JavaEE environment. I'm struggling to find more than vague references like it being "inappropriate for a managed environment" though.

Ah, here:

http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=236

"JavaTM Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE and formally known as J2EETM) server containers such as the enterprise bean or web component container do not allow using common Java SE concurrency APIs such as java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor, java.lang.Thread, java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor or java.util.Timer directly."

and

"java.util.Timer, java.lang.Thread and the Java SE concurrency utilities (JSR-166) in the java.util.concurrency package should never be used within managed environments, as it creates threads outside the purview of the container."

I suspect that PgJDBC will have to get a timer from the container via JNDI and fall back to direct instantiation if it is in a Java SE environment. I'm not sure how to do that right now or whether it can be done in a container-independent way (*shudder*). I'm quite sure that using EJB timers is NOT the right way to do it - they're not supported by web profile containers and are really intended for "business level" timers that should be persistent across redeploy/relaunch of appserver/reboot.

I've CC'd David Fetter, the author of the JDBC patch.

--
Craig Ringer



--
Sylvain Mougenot


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?