Re: shared_buffers vs Linux file cache

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Roman Konoval
Тема Re: shared_buffers vs Linux file cache
Дата
Msg-id CABcZEEAa_DQr458OSdyeYFJV+cpXvmhwaW9D9_+E5uPaSB1qgg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: shared_buffers vs Linux file cache  (Huan Ruan <huan.ruan.it@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Huan,

Residential memory is part of the process memory that is now swapped and is in RAM. This includes also memory shared with other processes so sum of RES for all processes may be greater that total physical memory.

I recommend this article http://www.depesz.com/2012/06/09/how-much-ram-is-postgresql-using/ to get better understanding how linux manages memory.

Regards,
Roman

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Huan Ruan <huan.ruan.it@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks very much, Glyn, Jeff, and Tom. That was very clearly explained.

A related case, see the following top dump. The Postgres process is using 87g residential memory, which I thought was the physical memory consumed by a process that can't be shared with others. While, the free+cached is about 155gb. But, (87 + 155) is bigger than the total available 198g RAM. Does this mean some of the residential memory used by Postgres is actually shareable to others?
   

>> Mem:  198311880k total, 183836408k used, 14475472k free, 8388k buffers
>> Swap:  4194300k total,   314284k used,  3880016k free, 141105408k cached
>>
>>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+ COMMAND
>> 15338 postgres  20   0 97.9g  87g  87g S  0.3 46.4  21:47.44 
>> postgres: checkpointer process
>> 27473 postgres  20   0 98.1g  29g  29g S  0.0 15.8   2:14.93 
>> postgres: xxxx idle
>>  4710 postgres  20   0 98.1g  24g  23g S  0.0 12.7   1:17.41 
>> postgres: xxxx idle 
>> 26587 postgres 20 0 98.0g 15g 15g S 0.0 8.0 1:21.24 
 


 


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Strange choice of general index over partial index
Следующее
От: Laurent Cathala
Дата:
Сообщение: Initial insert