On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:43:04PM +0300, Dave Page wrote:
> > > and you are right they didn't upgrade 9.3.X. I am not sure what
> > > requirement we have for packagers listed on our website to have the
> most
> > > recent versions of _all_ major releases. If they just didn't list
> > > 9.3.X anymore and had the most recent major release available, is that
> > > sufficient? Does someone know? I am CC'ing two of our web people.
> >
> > We certainly expect anything that they list to be up to date, and
> > coordinated with the official release. I don't think we have a policy
> > on which branches should be supported though (perhaps we should - in
> > which case, I'd push for all of them).
>
> OK, should someone contact BigSQL and ask them to either remove the
> 9.3.X release or update it? I can do that. Do we want to require all
> supported branches and check all existing links?
>
>
We'll get 9.3.6 up ASAP. It must have just fallen through the cracks.