On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I think this can be blamed on a9ba6195f, which I only back-patched as >> far as 9.5 --- guess I didn't realize that the bogus section name >> existed further back. So I think the answer to your direct question >> is "a single page", but maybe we should instead proceed by bringing 9.4 >> into line with the later branches and then updating the docs?
> Adding the mapping to the website was a single row in a db table, and is > already done, so it wasn't a lot of work. But there might be other reasons > to change it of course, for consistency.
> Of course, actually *changing* it in 9.4 now will break any external links > pointing to it. Links within our own documentation will pick it up and > change accordingly, but anything that's linking from the outside will > generate 404s.
The db table doesn't result in generating redirects then, I take it?
Nope, the db table doesn't have the versions. It's just: