On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
>> Is there a particular reason we don't have an ALTER DATABASE switch
>> that controls the datallowconn, or is it just something "missed out"?
>
> I think it can be removed, or rather deprecated.
>
> datconnlimit can be set to 0
superusers bypass datconnlimit, but not datallowconn, don't they?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/