Re: -O switch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: -O switch
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyXH=6fhxrUPCtkr3zGQGtrVq+bvUtCmNaKDOhpeU_FrA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: -O switch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: -O switch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > postgres --help:
> >   -o OPTIONS         pass "OPTIONS" to each server process (obsolete)
>
> > This was marked obsolete in 2006 (86c23a6eb28).
>
> I don't think it's really obsolete ... don't we use that to pass
> PGOPTIONS through from the client?

Then it probably shouldn't be labeled as obsolete :)

That said, I don't think we do, or I'm misunderstanding what you mean.
The startup packet which holds the client options is not read until
we're already in the child process, so there is no further exec to be
done?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: -O switch
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum worker doesn't immediately exit on postmaster death