Re: pg_basebackup, walreceiver and wal_sender_timeout

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: pg_basebackup, walreceiver and wal_sender_timeout
Дата
Msg-id CABUevExReCR7FjC9_ekMXpuzbGhMYu2FWpHztrJraY9JkxTbaA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_basebackup, walreceiver and wal_sender_timeout  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: pg_basebackup, walreceiver and wal_sender_timeout  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: pg_basebackup, walreceiver and wal_sender_timeout  (Oleksii Kliukin <alexk@hintbits.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:19 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:00:59PM +0100, Alex Kliukin wrote:
> While reading the doc page for the pg_basebackup, I've been confused
> by the fact that it says WAL files will be written to .tarballs
> (either base.tar or pg_wal.tar) when pg_basebackup is instructed to
> stream WALs alongside the backup itself. I think it makes sense to
> elaborate that it only happens when tar format is specified (doc
> patch is attached).

Agreed.  The current wording can be confusing depending on the format,
and your suggestion looks right.  Any opinions from others?

Agreed, definitely confusing.

Since you also agreed on it, I went ahead and pushed (with backpatch).

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition