[HACKERS] Checksums by default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Дата
Msg-id CABUevExR+1Xh5rM30m8=aWgQsteM-t0VVK+xcoiqHKSRZ+3BFg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to turn it off instead?

I keep running into situations where people haven't enabled it, because (a) they didn't know about it, or (b) their packaging system ran initdb for them so they didn't even know they could. And of course they usually figure this out once the db has enough data and traffic that the only way to fix it is to set up something like slony/bucardo/pglogical and a whole new server to deal with it.. (Which is something that would also be good to fix -- but having the default changed would be useful as well)

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] patch: function xmltable
Следующее
От: Erik Rijkers
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html