We seem to have been fairly inconsistent in whether we call this
operation "tag" or "stamp", if we look at it historically. With a
little turn towards "tag" lately.
May I humbly suggest that we actually start calling it "stamp"
instead, to make it very clear that this is a different operation from
the "git tag" operation that's done on the tree a bit later?
Reasonable?
//Magnus
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 23:24, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Tag 9.1rc1.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL9_1_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d89b8daf5ee05f9c6fa63695e88d2315a224bf2d
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> configure | 18 +++++++++---------
> configure.in | 2 +-
> doc/bug.template | 2 +-
> src/include/pg_config.h.win32 | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
>